diff options
| author | Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu> | 2008-07-31 13:41:58 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> | 2008-10-23 05:13:25 -0400 |
| commit | f696a3659fc4b3a3bf4bc83d9dbec5e5a2ffd929 (patch) | |
| tree | 738adf557608f26e881a710839de12b7527549b6 /fs/hfsplus | |
| parent | 5cec56deb6d41b5b570306b17cd0b1590ebd0897 (diff) | |
| download | kernel_samsung_tuna-f696a3659fc4b3a3bf4bc83d9dbec5e5a2ffd929.zip kernel_samsung_tuna-f696a3659fc4b3a3bf4bc83d9dbec5e5a2ffd929.tar.gz kernel_samsung_tuna-f696a3659fc4b3a3bf4bc83d9dbec5e5a2ffd929.tar.bz2 | |
[PATCH] move executable checking into ->permission()
For execute permission on a regular files we need to check if file has
any execute bits at all, regardless of capabilites.
This check is normally performed by generic_permission() but was also
added to the case when the filesystem defines its own ->permission()
method. In the latter case the filesystem should be responsible for
performing this check.
Move the check from inode_permission() inside filesystems which are
not calling generic_permission().
Create a helper function execute_ok() that returns true if the inode
is a directory or if any execute bits are present in i_mode.
Also fix up the following code:
- coda control file is never executable
- sysctl files are never executable
- hfs_permission seems broken on MAY_EXEC, remove
- hfsplus_permission is eqivalent to generic_permission(), remove
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/hfsplus')
| -rw-r--r-- | fs/hfsplus/inode.c | 13 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 13 deletions
diff --git a/fs/hfsplus/inode.c b/fs/hfsplus/inode.c index 963be64..b207f0e 100644 --- a/fs/hfsplus/inode.c +++ b/fs/hfsplus/inode.c @@ -238,18 +238,6 @@ static void hfsplus_set_perms(struct inode *inode, struct hfsplus_perm *perms) perms->dev = cpu_to_be32(HFSPLUS_I(inode).dev); } -static int hfsplus_permission(struct inode *inode, int mask) -{ - /* MAY_EXEC is also used for lookup, if no x bit is set allow lookup, - * open_exec has the same test, so it's still not executable, if a x bit - * is set fall back to standard permission check. - */ - if (S_ISREG(inode->i_mode) && mask & MAY_EXEC && !(inode->i_mode & 0111)) - return 0; - return generic_permission(inode, mask, NULL); -} - - static int hfsplus_file_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file) { if (HFSPLUS_IS_RSRC(inode)) @@ -281,7 +269,6 @@ static int hfsplus_file_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file) static const struct inode_operations hfsplus_file_inode_operations = { .lookup = hfsplus_file_lookup, .truncate = hfsplus_file_truncate, - .permission = hfsplus_permission, .setxattr = hfsplus_setxattr, .getxattr = hfsplus_getxattr, .listxattr = hfsplus_listxattr, |