aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_buf.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>2010-01-26 15:13:25 +1100
committerDave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>2010-01-26 15:13:25 +1100
commit089716aa1480b7197bcd678b8477774c379a2768 (patch)
tree63d38d2a210dc103ac106ebf88eecf94005c31b2 /fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_buf.c
parentd808f617ad00a413585b806de340feda5ad9a2da (diff)
downloadkernel_samsung_tuna-089716aa1480b7197bcd678b8477774c379a2768.zip
kernel_samsung_tuna-089716aa1480b7197bcd678b8477774c379a2768.tar.gz
kernel_samsung_tuna-089716aa1480b7197bcd678b8477774c379a2768.tar.bz2
xfs: Sort delayed write buffers before dispatch
Currently when the xfsbufd writes delayed write buffers, it pushes them to disk in the order they come off the delayed write list. If there are lots of buffers Ń•pread widely over the disk, this results in overwhelming the elevator sort queues in the block layer and we end up losing the posibility of merging adjacent buffers to minimise the number of IOs. Use the new generic list_sort function to sort the delwri dispatch queue before issue to ensure that the buffers are pushed in the most friendly order possible to the lower layers. Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_buf.c')
-rw-r--r--fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_buf.c87
1 files changed, 60 insertions, 27 deletions
diff --git a/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_buf.c b/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_buf.c
index b306265..4556a4c 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_buf.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_buf.c
@@ -33,6 +33,7 @@
#include <linux/migrate.h>
#include <linux/backing-dev.h>
#include <linux/freezer.h>
+#include <linux/list_sort.h>
#include "xfs_sb.h"
#include "xfs_inum.h"
@@ -1877,14 +1878,42 @@ xfs_buf_delwri_split(
}
+/*
+ * Compare function is more complex than it needs to be because
+ * the return value is only 32 bits and we are doing comparisons
+ * on 64 bit values
+ */
+static int
+xfs_buf_cmp(
+ void *priv,
+ struct list_head *a,
+ struct list_head *b)
+{
+ struct xfs_buf *ap = container_of(a, struct xfs_buf, b_list);
+ struct xfs_buf *bp = container_of(b, struct xfs_buf, b_list);
+ xfs_daddr_t diff;
+
+ diff = ap->b_bn - bp->b_bn;
+ if (diff < 0)
+ return -1;
+ if (diff > 0)
+ return 1;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+void
+xfs_buf_delwri_sort(
+ xfs_buftarg_t *target,
+ struct list_head *list)
+{
+ list_sort(NULL, list, xfs_buf_cmp);
+}
+
STATIC int
xfsbufd(
void *data)
{
- struct list_head tmp;
- xfs_buftarg_t *target = (xfs_buftarg_t *)data;
- int count;
- xfs_buf_t *bp;
+ xfs_buftarg_t *target = (xfs_buftarg_t *)data;
current->flags |= PF_MEMALLOC;
@@ -1893,6 +1922,8 @@ xfsbufd(
do {
long age = xfs_buf_age_centisecs * msecs_to_jiffies(10);
long tout = xfs_buf_timer_centisecs * msecs_to_jiffies(10);
+ int count = 0;
+ struct list_head tmp;
if (unlikely(freezing(current))) {
set_bit(XBT_FORCE_SLEEP, &target->bt_flags);
@@ -1907,11 +1938,10 @@ xfsbufd(
schedule_timeout_interruptible(tout);
xfs_buf_delwri_split(target, &tmp, age);
- count = 0;
+ list_sort(NULL, &tmp, xfs_buf_cmp);
while (!list_empty(&tmp)) {
- bp = list_entry(tmp.next, xfs_buf_t, b_list);
- ASSERT(target == bp->b_target);
-
+ struct xfs_buf *bp;
+ bp = list_first_entry(&tmp, struct xfs_buf, b_list);
list_del_init(&bp->b_list);
xfs_buf_iostrategy(bp);
count++;
@@ -1937,42 +1967,45 @@ xfs_flush_buftarg(
xfs_buftarg_t *target,
int wait)
{
- struct list_head tmp;
- xfs_buf_t *bp, *n;
+ xfs_buf_t *bp;
int pincount = 0;
+ LIST_HEAD(tmp_list);
+ LIST_HEAD(wait_list);
xfs_buf_runall_queues(xfsconvertd_workqueue);
xfs_buf_runall_queues(xfsdatad_workqueue);
xfs_buf_runall_queues(xfslogd_workqueue);
set_bit(XBT_FORCE_FLUSH, &target->bt_flags);
- pincount = xfs_buf_delwri_split(target, &tmp, 0);
+ pincount = xfs_buf_delwri_split(target, &tmp_list, 0);
/*
- * Dropped the delayed write list lock, now walk the temporary list
+ * Dropped the delayed write list lock, now walk the temporary list.
+ * All I/O is issued async and then if we need to wait for completion
+ * we do that after issuing all the IO.
*/
- list_for_each_entry_safe(bp, n, &tmp, b_list) {
+ list_sort(NULL, &tmp_list, xfs_buf_cmp);
+ while (!list_empty(&tmp_list)) {
+ bp = list_first_entry(&tmp_list, struct xfs_buf, b_list);
ASSERT(target == bp->b_target);
- if (wait)
+ list_del_init(&bp->b_list);
+ if (wait) {
bp->b_flags &= ~XBF_ASYNC;
- else
- list_del_init(&bp->b_list);
-
+ list_add(&bp->b_list, &wait_list);
+ }
xfs_buf_iostrategy(bp);
}
- if (wait)
+ if (wait) {
+ /* Expedite and wait for IO to complete. */
blk_run_address_space(target->bt_mapping);
+ while (!list_empty(&wait_list)) {
+ bp = list_first_entry(&wait_list, struct xfs_buf, b_list);
- /*
- * Remaining list items must be flushed before returning
- */
- while (!list_empty(&tmp)) {
- bp = list_entry(tmp.next, xfs_buf_t, b_list);
-
- list_del_init(&bp->b_list);
- xfs_iowait(bp);
- xfs_buf_relse(bp);
+ list_del_init(&bp->b_list);
+ xfs_iowait(bp);
+ xfs_buf_relse(bp);
+ }
}
return pincount;