diff options
| author | Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> | 2011-02-24 09:56:32 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2011-02-24 08:55:55 -0800 |
| commit | e7407d1619713f4b1fdff3a485e1bd8e77bd480d (patch) | |
| tree | 18def7871239d5de7dea8cb115badb53d64fccb4 /fs | |
| parent | 8074b26f67165bf045d92e778c9c10dc5e207fc6 (diff) | |
| download | kernel_samsung_tuna-e7407d1619713f4b1fdff3a485e1bd8e77bd480d.zip kernel_samsung_tuna-e7407d1619713f4b1fdff3a485e1bd8e77bd480d.tar.gz kernel_samsung_tuna-e7407d1619713f4b1fdff3a485e1bd8e77bd480d.tar.bz2 | |
block: bd_link_disk_holder() should hold on to holder_dir
The new implementation of bd_link_disk_holder() added by 49731baa41d
(block: restore multiple bd_link_disk_holder() support) didn't get an
extra reference for the holder_dir kobject of the slave bdev; however,
bdev kills holder_dir on removal, not release, so if the slave bdev is
removed while there are holder links, the holder_dir will be destroyed
while there still are holder links, which leads to oops later when
bd_unlink_disk_order() tries to remove those links.
Make bd_link_disk_holder() grab an extra reference for the slave's
holder_dir and put it in bd_unlink_disk_holder().
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Reported-by: "Hawrylewicz Czarnowski, Przemyslaw" <przemyslaw.hawrylewicz.czarnowski@intel.com>
Tested-by: "Hawrylewicz Czarnowski, Przemyslaw" <przemyslaw.hawrylewicz.czarnowski@intel.com>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs')
| -rw-r--r-- | fs/block_dev.c | 6 |
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/fs/block_dev.c b/fs/block_dev.c index 4fb8a34..94d41db 100644 --- a/fs/block_dev.c +++ b/fs/block_dev.c @@ -873,6 +873,11 @@ int bd_link_disk_holder(struct block_device *bdev, struct gendisk *disk) ret = add_symlink(bdev->bd_part->holder_dir, &disk_to_dev(disk)->kobj); if (ret) goto out_del; + /* + * bdev could be deleted beneath us which would implicitly destroy + * the holder directory. Hold on to it. + */ + kobject_get(bdev->bd_part->holder_dir); list_add(&holder->list, &bdev->bd_holder_disks); goto out_unlock; @@ -909,6 +914,7 @@ void bd_unlink_disk_holder(struct block_device *bdev, struct gendisk *disk) del_symlink(disk->slave_dir, &part_to_dev(bdev->bd_part)->kobj); del_symlink(bdev->bd_part->holder_dir, &disk_to_dev(disk)->kobj); + kobject_put(bdev->bd_part->holder_dir); list_del_init(&holder->list); kfree(holder); } |