1 files changed, 20 insertions, 20 deletions

diff --git a/kernel/auditfilter.c b/kernel/auditfilter.c
index 7c69cb5..28fef6b 100644
--- a/kernel/auditfilter.c
+++ b/kernel/auditfilter.c
@@ -139,8 +139,8 @@ static inline void audit_free_rule(struct audit_entry *e)
 	if (e->rule.fields)
 		for (i = 0; i < e->rule.field_count; i++) {
 			struct audit_field *f = &e->rule.fields[i];
-			kfree(f->se_str);
-			security_audit_rule_free(f->se_rule);
+			kfree(f->lsm_str);
+			security_audit_rule_free(f->lsm_rule);
 		}
 	kfree(e->rule.fields);
 	kfree(e->rule.filterkey);
@@ -554,8 +554,8 @@ static struct audit_entry *audit_data_to_entry(struct audit_rule_data *data,
 		f->op = data->fieldflags[i] & AUDIT_OPERATORS;
 		f->type = data->fields[i];
 		f->val = data->values[i];
-		f->se_str = NULL;
-		f->se_rule = NULL;
+		f->lsm_str = NULL;
+		f->lsm_rule = NULL;
 		switch(f->type) {
 		case AUDIT_PID:
 		case AUDIT_UID:
@@ -598,7 +598,7 @@ static struct audit_entry *audit_data_to_entry(struct audit_rule_data *data,
 			entry->rule.buflen += f->val;
 
 			err = security_audit_rule_init(f->type, f->op, str,
-						       (void **)&f->se_rule);
+						       (void **)&f->lsm_rule);
 			/* Keep currently invalid fields around in case they
 			 * become valid after a policy reload. */
 			if (err == -EINVAL) {
@@ -610,7 +610,7 @@ static struct audit_entry *audit_data_to_entry(struct audit_rule_data *data,
 				kfree(str);
 				goto exit_free;
 			} else
-				f->se_str = str;
+				f->lsm_str = str;
 			break;
 		case AUDIT_WATCH:
 			str = audit_unpack_string(&bufp, &remain, f->val);
@@ -754,7 +754,7 @@ static struct audit_rule_data *audit_krule_to_data(struct audit_krule *krule)
 		case AUDIT_OBJ_LEV_LOW:
 		case AUDIT_OBJ_LEV_HIGH:
 			data->buflen += data->values[i] =
-				audit_pack_string(&bufp, f->se_str);
+				audit_pack_string(&bufp, f->lsm_str);
 			break;
 		case AUDIT_WATCH:
 			data->buflen += data->values[i] =
@@ -806,7 +806,7 @@ static int audit_compare_rule(struct audit_krule *a, struct audit_krule *b)
 		case AUDIT_OBJ_TYPE:
 		case AUDIT_OBJ_LEV_LOW:
 		case AUDIT_OBJ_LEV_HIGH:
-			if (strcmp(a->fields[i].se_str, b->fields[i].se_str))
+			if (strcmp(a->fields[i].lsm_str, b->fields[i].lsm_str))
 				return 1;
 			break;
 		case AUDIT_WATCH:
@@ -862,28 +862,28 @@ out:
 	return new;
 }
 
-/* Duplicate LSM field information.  The se_rule is opaque, so must be
+/* Duplicate LSM field information.  The lsm_rule is opaque, so must be
  * re-initialized. */
 static inline int audit_dupe_lsm_field(struct audit_field *df,
 					   struct audit_field *sf)
 {
 	int ret = 0;
-	char *se_str;
+	char *lsm_str;
 
-	/* our own copy of se_str */
-	se_str = kstrdup(sf->se_str, GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (unlikely(!se_str))
+	/* our own copy of lsm_str */
+	lsm_str = kstrdup(sf->lsm_str, GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (unlikely(!lsm_str))
 		return -ENOMEM;
-	df->se_str = se_str;
+	df->lsm_str = lsm_str;
 
-	/* our own (refreshed) copy of se_rule */
-	ret = security_audit_rule_init(df->type, df->op, df->se_str,
-				       (void **)&df->se_rule);
+	/* our own (refreshed) copy of lsm_rule */
+	ret = security_audit_rule_init(df->type, df->op, df->lsm_str,
+				       (void **)&df->lsm_rule);
 	/* Keep currently invalid fields around in case they
 	 * become valid after a policy reload. */
 	if (ret == -EINVAL) {
 		printk(KERN_WARNING "audit rule for LSM \'%s\' is "
-		       "invalid\n", df->se_str);
+		       "invalid\n", df->lsm_str);
 		ret = 0;
 	}
 
@@ -930,7 +930,7 @@ static struct audit_entry *audit_dupe_rule(struct audit_krule *old,
 	new->tree = old->tree;
 	memcpy(new->fields, old->fields, sizeof(struct audit_field) * fcount);
 
-	/* deep copy this information, updating the se_rule fields, because
+	/* deep copy this information, updating the lsm_rule fields, because
 	 * the originals will all be freed when the old rule is freed. */
 	for (i = 0; i < fcount; i++) {
 		switch (new->fields[i].type) {
@@ -1762,7 +1762,7 @@ unlock_and_return:
 	return result;
 }
 
-/* This function will re-initialize the se_rule field of all applicable rules.
+/* This function will re-initialize the lsm_rule field of all applicable rules.
  * It will traverse the filter lists serarching for rules that contain LSM
  * specific filter fields.  When such a rule is found, it is copied, the
  * LSM field is re-initialized, and the old rule is replaced with the