Delete RuntimeTest freeMemory test

Test was flaky due to bad assumptions, Runtime.freeMemory is already
tested by test_memory, test_gc.

Bug: 17448025

(cherry picked from commit e2233ca92da0339686da18db4a1e27b9a4c76b91)

Change-Id: I88d09ee5cd1c4e34c97814afd2cbadc870222738

1 files changed, 0 insertions, 15 deletions

diff --git a/harmony-tests/src/test/java/org/apache/harmony/tests/java/lang/RuntimeTest.java b/harmony-tests/src/test/java/org/apache/harmony/tests/java/lang/RuntimeTest.java
index 17f822d..a41efb3 100644
--- a/harmony-tests/src/test/java/org/apache/harmony/tests/java/lang/RuntimeTest.java
+++ b/harmony-tests/src/test/java/org/apache/harmony/tests/java/lang/RuntimeTest.java
@@ -145,21 +145,6 @@ public class RuntimeTest extends junit.framework.TestCase {
         assertTrue("maxMemory() < totalMemory()", r.maxMemory() >= r.totalMemory());
     }
 
-    public void test_freeMemory() {
-        // Heap might grow or do GC at any time, so we can't really test a lot. Hence we are just
-        // doing some basic sanity checks here.
-        long freeBefore = r.freeMemory();
-        List<byte[]> arrays = new ArrayList<byte[]>();
-        for (int i = 1; i < 10; i++) {
-            arrays.add(new byte[10000]);
-        }
-        long freeAfter =  r.freeMemory();
-
-        // If totalMemory() has grown/shrunk freeMemory() might have gone down or up, but the
-        // freeMemory is unlikely to stay the same.
-        assertTrue("free memory must change with allocations", freeAfter != freeBefore);
-    }
-
     public RuntimeTest() {
     }