diff options
author | Brian Carlstrom <bdc@google.com> | 2013-12-11 22:46:45 -0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | Brian Carlstrom <bdc@google.com> | 2013-12-18 22:32:13 -0800 |
commit | 1693d7e48f976c2615100378c7e98d245e0213be (patch) | |
tree | c7d44f2b69021f0d96887a9e6b36fdade2bcf7d5 /libutils/tests/Looper_test.cpp | |
parent | d27498cbef862fccb857d7d8970418b893f550ca (diff) | |
download | system_core-1693d7e48f976c2615100378c7e98d245e0213be.zip system_core-1693d7e48f976c2615100378c7e98d245e0213be.tar.gz system_core-1693d7e48f976c2615100378c7e98d245e0213be.tar.bz2 |
Make libutils Looper independent of frameworks/native
Change-Id: I1dacca10a3cd7601abc3451b69ed761bf71c38fe
Diffstat (limited to 'libutils/tests/Looper_test.cpp')
-rw-r--r-- | libutils/tests/Looper_test.cpp | 158 |
1 files changed, 79 insertions, 79 deletions
diff --git a/libutils/tests/Looper_test.cpp b/libutils/tests/Looper_test.cpp index 8bf2ba2..00077e6 100644 --- a/libutils/tests/Looper_test.cpp +++ b/libutils/tests/Looper_test.cpp @@ -119,8 +119,8 @@ TEST_F(LooperTest, PollOnce_WhenNonZeroTimeoutAndNotAwoken_WaitsForTimeout) { EXPECT_NEAR(100, elapsedMillis, TIMING_TOLERANCE_MS) << "elapsed time should approx. equal timeout"; - EXPECT_EQ(ALOOPER_POLL_TIMEOUT, result) - << "pollOnce result should be ALOOPER_POLL_TIMEOUT"; + EXPECT_EQ(Looper::POLL_TIMEOUT, result) + << "pollOnce result should be LOOPER_POLL_TIMEOUT"; } TEST_F(LooperTest, PollOnce_WhenNonZeroTimeoutAndAwokenBeforeWaiting_ImmediatelyReturns) { @@ -132,8 +132,8 @@ TEST_F(LooperTest, PollOnce_WhenNonZeroTimeoutAndAwokenBeforeWaiting_Immediately EXPECT_NEAR(0, elapsedMillis, TIMING_TOLERANCE_MS) << "elapsed time should approx. zero because wake() was called before waiting"; - EXPECT_EQ(ALOOPER_POLL_WAKE, result) - << "pollOnce result should be ALOOPER_POLL_CALLBACK because loop was awoken"; + EXPECT_EQ(Looper::POLL_WAKE, result) + << "pollOnce result should be Looper::POLL_CALLBACK because loop was awoken"; } TEST_F(LooperTest, PollOnce_WhenNonZeroTimeoutAndAwokenWhileWaiting_PromptlyReturns) { @@ -146,8 +146,8 @@ TEST_F(LooperTest, PollOnce_WhenNonZeroTimeoutAndAwokenWhileWaiting_PromptlyRetu EXPECT_NEAR(100, elapsedMillis, TIMING_TOLERANCE_MS) << "elapsed time should approx. equal wake delay"; - EXPECT_EQ(ALOOPER_POLL_WAKE, result) - << "pollOnce result should be ALOOPER_POLL_CALLBACK because loop was awoken"; + EXPECT_EQ(Looper::POLL_WAKE, result) + << "pollOnce result should be Looper::POLL_CALLBACK because loop was awoken"; } TEST_F(LooperTest, PollOnce_WhenZeroTimeoutAndNoRegisteredFDs_ImmediatelyReturns) { @@ -157,15 +157,15 @@ TEST_F(LooperTest, PollOnce_WhenZeroTimeoutAndNoRegisteredFDs_ImmediatelyReturns EXPECT_NEAR(0, elapsedMillis, TIMING_TOLERANCE_MS) << "elapsed time should be approx. zero"; - EXPECT_EQ(ALOOPER_POLL_TIMEOUT, result) - << "pollOnce result should be ALOOPER_POLL_TIMEOUT"; + EXPECT_EQ(Looper::POLL_TIMEOUT, result) + << "pollOnce result should be Looper::POLL_TIMEOUT"; } TEST_F(LooperTest, PollOnce_WhenZeroTimeoutAndNoSignalledFDs_ImmediatelyReturns) { Pipe pipe; StubCallbackHandler handler(true); - handler.setCallback(mLooper, pipe.receiveFd, ALOOPER_EVENT_INPUT); + handler.setCallback(mLooper, pipe.receiveFd, Looper::EVENT_INPUT); StopWatch stopWatch("pollOnce"); int result = mLooper->pollOnce(0); @@ -173,8 +173,8 @@ TEST_F(LooperTest, PollOnce_WhenZeroTimeoutAndNoSignalledFDs_ImmediatelyReturns) EXPECT_NEAR(0, elapsedMillis, TIMING_TOLERANCE_MS) << "elapsed time should be approx. zero"; - EXPECT_EQ(ALOOPER_POLL_TIMEOUT, result) - << "pollOnce result should be ALOOPER_POLL_TIMEOUT"; + EXPECT_EQ(Looper::POLL_TIMEOUT, result) + << "pollOnce result should be Looper::POLL_TIMEOUT"; EXPECT_EQ(0, handler.callbackCount) << "callback should not have been invoked because FD was not signalled"; } @@ -184,7 +184,7 @@ TEST_F(LooperTest, PollOnce_WhenZeroTimeoutAndSignalledFD_ImmediatelyInvokesCall StubCallbackHandler handler(true); ASSERT_EQ(OK, pipe.writeSignal()); - handler.setCallback(mLooper, pipe.receiveFd, ALOOPER_EVENT_INPUT); + handler.setCallback(mLooper, pipe.receiveFd, Looper::EVENT_INPUT); StopWatch stopWatch("pollOnce"); int result = mLooper->pollOnce(0); @@ -192,21 +192,21 @@ TEST_F(LooperTest, PollOnce_WhenZeroTimeoutAndSignalledFD_ImmediatelyInvokesCall EXPECT_NEAR(0, elapsedMillis, TIMING_TOLERANCE_MS) << "elapsed time should be approx. zero"; - EXPECT_EQ(ALOOPER_POLL_CALLBACK, result) - << "pollOnce result should be ALOOPER_POLL_CALLBACK because FD was signalled"; + EXPECT_EQ(Looper::POLL_CALLBACK, result) + << "pollOnce result should be Looper::POLL_CALLBACK because FD was signalled"; EXPECT_EQ(1, handler.callbackCount) << "callback should be invoked exactly once"; EXPECT_EQ(pipe.receiveFd, handler.fd) << "callback should have received pipe fd as parameter"; - EXPECT_EQ(ALOOPER_EVENT_INPUT, handler.events) - << "callback should have received ALOOPER_EVENT_INPUT as events"; + EXPECT_EQ(Looper::EVENT_INPUT, handler.events) + << "callback should have received Looper::EVENT_INPUT as events"; } TEST_F(LooperTest, PollOnce_WhenNonZeroTimeoutAndNoSignalledFDs_WaitsForTimeoutAndReturns) { Pipe pipe; StubCallbackHandler handler(true); - handler.setCallback(mLooper, pipe.receiveFd, ALOOPER_EVENT_INPUT); + handler.setCallback(mLooper, pipe.receiveFd, Looper::EVENT_INPUT); StopWatch stopWatch("pollOnce"); int result = mLooper->pollOnce(100); @@ -214,8 +214,8 @@ TEST_F(LooperTest, PollOnce_WhenNonZeroTimeoutAndNoSignalledFDs_WaitsForTimeoutA EXPECT_NEAR(100, elapsedMillis, TIMING_TOLERANCE_MS) << "elapsed time should approx. equal timeout"; - EXPECT_EQ(ALOOPER_POLL_TIMEOUT, result) - << "pollOnce result should be ALOOPER_POLL_TIMEOUT"; + EXPECT_EQ(Looper::POLL_TIMEOUT, result) + << "pollOnce result should be Looper::POLL_TIMEOUT"; EXPECT_EQ(0, handler.callbackCount) << "callback should not have been invoked because FD was not signalled"; } @@ -225,7 +225,7 @@ TEST_F(LooperTest, PollOnce_WhenNonZeroTimeoutAndSignalledFDBeforeWaiting_Immedi StubCallbackHandler handler(true); pipe.writeSignal(); - handler.setCallback(mLooper, pipe.receiveFd, ALOOPER_EVENT_INPUT); + handler.setCallback(mLooper, pipe.receiveFd, Looper::EVENT_INPUT); StopWatch stopWatch("pollOnce"); int result = mLooper->pollOnce(100); @@ -235,14 +235,14 @@ TEST_F(LooperTest, PollOnce_WhenNonZeroTimeoutAndSignalledFDBeforeWaiting_Immedi << "signal should actually have been written"; EXPECT_NEAR(0, elapsedMillis, TIMING_TOLERANCE_MS) << "elapsed time should be approx. zero"; - EXPECT_EQ(ALOOPER_POLL_CALLBACK, result) - << "pollOnce result should be ALOOPER_POLL_CALLBACK because FD was signalled"; + EXPECT_EQ(Looper::POLL_CALLBACK, result) + << "pollOnce result should be Looper::POLL_CALLBACK because FD was signalled"; EXPECT_EQ(1, handler.callbackCount) << "callback should be invoked exactly once"; EXPECT_EQ(pipe.receiveFd, handler.fd) << "callback should have received pipe fd as parameter"; - EXPECT_EQ(ALOOPER_EVENT_INPUT, handler.events) - << "callback should have received ALOOPER_EVENT_INPUT as events"; + EXPECT_EQ(Looper::EVENT_INPUT, handler.events) + << "callback should have received Looper::EVENT_INPUT as events"; } TEST_F(LooperTest, PollOnce_WhenNonZeroTimeoutAndSignalledFDWhileWaiting_PromptlyInvokesCallbackAndReturns) { @@ -250,7 +250,7 @@ TEST_F(LooperTest, PollOnce_WhenNonZeroTimeoutAndSignalledFDWhileWaiting_Promptl StubCallbackHandler handler(true); sp<DelayedWriteSignal> delayedWriteSignal = new DelayedWriteSignal(100, & pipe); - handler.setCallback(mLooper, pipe.receiveFd, ALOOPER_EVENT_INPUT); + handler.setCallback(mLooper, pipe.receiveFd, Looper::EVENT_INPUT); delayedWriteSignal->run(); StopWatch stopWatch("pollOnce"); @@ -261,21 +261,21 @@ TEST_F(LooperTest, PollOnce_WhenNonZeroTimeoutAndSignalledFDWhileWaiting_Promptl << "signal should actually have been written"; EXPECT_NEAR(100, elapsedMillis, TIMING_TOLERANCE_MS) << "elapsed time should approx. equal signal delay"; - EXPECT_EQ(ALOOPER_POLL_CALLBACK, result) - << "pollOnce result should be ALOOPER_POLL_CALLBACK because FD was signalled"; + EXPECT_EQ(Looper::POLL_CALLBACK, result) + << "pollOnce result should be Looper::POLL_CALLBACK because FD was signalled"; EXPECT_EQ(1, handler.callbackCount) << "callback should be invoked exactly once"; EXPECT_EQ(pipe.receiveFd, handler.fd) << "callback should have received pipe fd as parameter"; - EXPECT_EQ(ALOOPER_EVENT_INPUT, handler.events) - << "callback should have received ALOOPER_EVENT_INPUT as events"; + EXPECT_EQ(Looper::EVENT_INPUT, handler.events) + << "callback should have received Looper::EVENT_INPUT as events"; } TEST_F(LooperTest, PollOnce_WhenCallbackAddedThenRemoved_CallbackShouldNotBeInvoked) { Pipe pipe; StubCallbackHandler handler(true); - handler.setCallback(mLooper, pipe.receiveFd, ALOOPER_EVENT_INPUT); + handler.setCallback(mLooper, pipe.receiveFd, Looper::EVENT_INPUT); pipe.writeSignal(); // would cause FD to be considered signalled mLooper->removeFd(pipe.receiveFd); @@ -287,8 +287,8 @@ TEST_F(LooperTest, PollOnce_WhenCallbackAddedThenRemoved_CallbackShouldNotBeInvo << "signal should actually have been written"; EXPECT_NEAR(100, elapsedMillis, TIMING_TOLERANCE_MS) << "elapsed time should approx. equal timeout because FD was no longer registered"; - EXPECT_EQ(ALOOPER_POLL_TIMEOUT, result) - << "pollOnce result should be ALOOPER_POLL_TIMEOUT"; + EXPECT_EQ(Looper::POLL_TIMEOUT, result) + << "pollOnce result should be Looper::POLL_TIMEOUT"; EXPECT_EQ(0, handler.callbackCount) << "callback should not be invoked"; } @@ -297,7 +297,7 @@ TEST_F(LooperTest, PollOnce_WhenCallbackReturnsFalse_CallbackShouldNotBeInvokedA Pipe pipe; StubCallbackHandler handler(false); - handler.setCallback(mLooper, pipe.receiveFd, ALOOPER_EVENT_INPUT); + handler.setCallback(mLooper, pipe.receiveFd, Looper::EVENT_INPUT); // First loop: Callback is registered and FD is signalled. pipe.writeSignal(); @@ -310,8 +310,8 @@ TEST_F(LooperTest, PollOnce_WhenCallbackReturnsFalse_CallbackShouldNotBeInvokedA << "signal should actually have been written"; EXPECT_NEAR(0, elapsedMillis, TIMING_TOLERANCE_MS) << "elapsed time should approx. equal zero because FD was already signalled"; - EXPECT_EQ(ALOOPER_POLL_CALLBACK, result) - << "pollOnce result should be ALOOPER_POLL_CALLBACK because FD was signalled"; + EXPECT_EQ(Looper::POLL_CALLBACK, result) + << "pollOnce result should be Looper::POLL_CALLBACK because FD was signalled"; EXPECT_EQ(1, handler.callbackCount) << "callback should be invoked"; @@ -326,8 +326,8 @@ TEST_F(LooperTest, PollOnce_WhenCallbackReturnsFalse_CallbackShouldNotBeInvokedA << "signal should actually have been written"; EXPECT_NEAR(0, elapsedMillis, TIMING_TOLERANCE_MS) << "elapsed time should approx. equal zero because timeout was zero"; - EXPECT_EQ(ALOOPER_POLL_TIMEOUT, result) - << "pollOnce result should be ALOOPER_POLL_TIMEOUT"; + EXPECT_EQ(Looper::POLL_TIMEOUT, result) + << "pollOnce result should be Looper::POLL_TIMEOUT"; EXPECT_EQ(1, handler.callbackCount) << "callback should not be invoked this time"; } @@ -339,7 +339,7 @@ TEST_F(LooperTest, PollOnce_WhenNonCallbackFdIsSignalled_ReturnsIdent) { Pipe pipe; pipe.writeSignal(); - mLooper->addFd(pipe.receiveFd, expectedIdent, ALOOPER_EVENT_INPUT, NULL, expectedData); + mLooper->addFd(pipe.receiveFd, expectedIdent, Looper::EVENT_INPUT, NULL, expectedData); StopWatch stopWatch("pollOnce"); int fd; @@ -356,15 +356,15 @@ TEST_F(LooperTest, PollOnce_WhenNonCallbackFdIsSignalled_ReturnsIdent) { << "pollOnce result should be the ident of the FD that was signalled"; EXPECT_EQ(pipe.receiveFd, fd) << "pollOnce should have returned the received pipe fd"; - EXPECT_EQ(ALOOPER_EVENT_INPUT, events) - << "pollOnce should have returned ALOOPER_EVENT_INPUT as events"; + EXPECT_EQ(Looper::EVENT_INPUT, events) + << "pollOnce should have returned Looper::EVENT_INPUT as events"; EXPECT_EQ(expectedData, data) << "pollOnce should have returned the data"; } TEST_F(LooperTest, AddFd_WhenCallbackAdded_ReturnsOne) { Pipe pipe; - int result = mLooper->addFd(pipe.receiveFd, 0, ALOOPER_EVENT_INPUT, NULL, NULL); + int result = mLooper->addFd(pipe.receiveFd, 0, Looper::EVENT_INPUT, NULL, NULL); EXPECT_EQ(1, result) << "addFd should return 1 because FD was added"; @@ -372,7 +372,7 @@ TEST_F(LooperTest, AddFd_WhenCallbackAdded_ReturnsOne) { TEST_F(LooperTest, AddFd_WhenIdentIsNegativeAndCallbackIsNull_ReturnsError) { Pipe pipe; - int result = mLooper->addFd(pipe.receiveFd, -1, ALOOPER_EVENT_INPUT, NULL, NULL); + int result = mLooper->addFd(pipe.receiveFd, -1, Looper::EVENT_INPUT, NULL, NULL); EXPECT_EQ(-1, result) << "addFd should return -1 because arguments were invalid"; @@ -397,7 +397,7 @@ TEST_F(LooperTest, RemoveFd_WhenCallbackNotAdded_ReturnsZero) { TEST_F(LooperTest, RemoveFd_WhenCallbackAddedThenRemovedTwice_ReturnsOnceFirstTimeAndReturnsZeroSecondTime) { Pipe pipe; StubCallbackHandler handler(false); - handler.setCallback(mLooper, pipe.receiveFd, ALOOPER_EVENT_INPUT); + handler.setCallback(mLooper, pipe.receiveFd, Looper::EVENT_INPUT); // First time. int result = mLooper->removeFd(pipe.receiveFd); @@ -417,8 +417,8 @@ TEST_F(LooperTest, PollOnce_WhenCallbackAddedTwice_OnlySecondCallbackShouldBeInv StubCallbackHandler handler1(true); StubCallbackHandler handler2(true); - handler1.setCallback(mLooper, pipe.receiveFd, ALOOPER_EVENT_INPUT); - handler2.setCallback(mLooper, pipe.receiveFd, ALOOPER_EVENT_INPUT); // replace it + handler1.setCallback(mLooper, pipe.receiveFd, Looper::EVENT_INPUT); + handler2.setCallback(mLooper, pipe.receiveFd, Looper::EVENT_INPUT); // replace it pipe.writeSignal(); // would cause FD to be considered signalled StopWatch stopWatch("pollOnce"); @@ -429,8 +429,8 @@ TEST_F(LooperTest, PollOnce_WhenCallbackAddedTwice_OnlySecondCallbackShouldBeInv << "signal should actually have been written"; EXPECT_NEAR(0, elapsedMillis, TIMING_TOLERANCE_MS) << "elapsed time should approx. zero because FD was already signalled"; - EXPECT_EQ(ALOOPER_POLL_CALLBACK, result) - << "pollOnce result should be ALOOPER_POLL_CALLBACK because FD was signalled"; + EXPECT_EQ(Looper::POLL_CALLBACK, result) + << "pollOnce result should be Looper::POLL_CALLBACK because FD was signalled"; EXPECT_EQ(0, handler1.callbackCount) << "original handler callback should not be invoked because it was replaced"; EXPECT_EQ(1, handler2.callbackCount) @@ -447,8 +447,8 @@ TEST_F(LooperTest, SendMessage_WhenOneMessageIsEnqueue_ShouldInvokeHandlerDuring EXPECT_NEAR(0, elapsedMillis, TIMING_TOLERANCE_MS) << "elapsed time should approx. zero because message was already sent"; - EXPECT_EQ(ALOOPER_POLL_CALLBACK, result) - << "pollOnce result should be ALOOPER_POLL_CALLBACK because message was sent"; + EXPECT_EQ(Looper::POLL_CALLBACK, result) + << "pollOnce result should be Looper::POLL_CALLBACK because message was sent"; EXPECT_EQ(size_t(1), handler->messages.size()) << "handled message"; EXPECT_EQ(MSG_TEST1, handler->messages[0].what) @@ -469,8 +469,8 @@ TEST_F(LooperTest, SendMessage_WhenMultipleMessagesAreEnqueued_ShouldInvokeHandl EXPECT_NEAR(0, elapsedMillis, TIMING_TOLERANCE_MS) << "elapsed time should approx. zero because message was already sent"; - EXPECT_EQ(ALOOPER_POLL_CALLBACK, result) - << "pollOnce result should be ALOOPER_POLL_CALLBACK because message was sent"; + EXPECT_EQ(Looper::POLL_CALLBACK, result) + << "pollOnce result should be Looper::POLL_CALLBACK because message was sent"; EXPECT_EQ(size_t(3), handler1->messages.size()) << "handled message"; EXPECT_EQ(MSG_TEST1, handler1->messages[0].what) @@ -495,8 +495,8 @@ TEST_F(LooperTest, SendMessageDelayed_WhenSentToTheFuture_ShouldInvokeHandlerAft EXPECT_NEAR(0, elapsedMillis, TIMING_TOLERANCE_MS) << "first poll should end quickly because next message timeout was computed"; - EXPECT_EQ(ALOOPER_POLL_WAKE, result) - << "pollOnce result should be ALOOPER_POLL_WAKE due to wakeup"; + EXPECT_EQ(Looper::POLL_WAKE, result) + << "pollOnce result should be Looper::POLL_WAKE due to wakeup"; EXPECT_EQ(size_t(0), handler->messages.size()) << "no message handled yet"; @@ -509,16 +509,16 @@ TEST_F(LooperTest, SendMessageDelayed_WhenSentToTheFuture_ShouldInvokeHandlerAft << "handled message"; EXPECT_NEAR(100, elapsedMillis, TIMING_TOLERANCE_MS) << "second poll should end around the time of the delayed message dispatch"; - EXPECT_EQ(ALOOPER_POLL_CALLBACK, result) - << "pollOnce result should be ALOOPER_POLL_CALLBACK because message was sent"; + EXPECT_EQ(Looper::POLL_CALLBACK, result) + << "pollOnce result should be Looper::POLL_CALLBACK because message was sent"; result = mLooper->pollOnce(100); elapsedMillis = ns2ms(stopWatch.elapsedTime()); EXPECT_NEAR(100 + 100, elapsedMillis, TIMING_TOLERANCE_MS) << "third poll should timeout"; - EXPECT_EQ(ALOOPER_POLL_TIMEOUT, result) - << "pollOnce result should be ALOOPER_POLL_TIMEOUT because there were no messages left"; + EXPECT_EQ(Looper::POLL_TIMEOUT, result) + << "pollOnce result should be Looper::POLL_TIMEOUT because there were no messages left"; } TEST_F(LooperTest, SendMessageDelayed_WhenSentToThePast_ShouldInvokeHandlerDuringNextPoll) { @@ -531,8 +531,8 @@ TEST_F(LooperTest, SendMessageDelayed_WhenSentToThePast_ShouldInvokeHandlerDurin EXPECT_NEAR(0, elapsedMillis, TIMING_TOLERANCE_MS) << "elapsed time should approx. zero because message was already sent"; - EXPECT_EQ(ALOOPER_POLL_CALLBACK, result) - << "pollOnce result should be ALOOPER_POLL_CALLBACK because message was sent"; + EXPECT_EQ(Looper::POLL_CALLBACK, result) + << "pollOnce result should be Looper::POLL_CALLBACK because message was sent"; EXPECT_EQ(size_t(1), handler->messages.size()) << "handled message"; EXPECT_EQ(MSG_TEST1, handler->messages[0].what) @@ -549,8 +549,8 @@ TEST_F(LooperTest, SendMessageDelayed_WhenSentToThePresent_ShouldInvokeHandlerDu EXPECT_NEAR(0, elapsedMillis, TIMING_TOLERANCE_MS) << "elapsed time should approx. zero because message was already sent"; - EXPECT_EQ(ALOOPER_POLL_CALLBACK, result) - << "pollOnce result should be ALOOPER_POLL_CALLBACK because message was sent"; + EXPECT_EQ(Looper::POLL_CALLBACK, result) + << "pollOnce result should be Looper::POLL_CALLBACK because message was sent"; EXPECT_EQ(size_t(1), handler->messages.size()) << "handled message"; EXPECT_EQ(MSG_TEST1, handler->messages[0].what) @@ -568,8 +568,8 @@ TEST_F(LooperTest, SendMessageAtTime_WhenSentToTheFuture_ShouldInvokeHandlerAfte EXPECT_NEAR(0, elapsedMillis, TIMING_TOLERANCE_MS) << "first poll should end quickly because next message timeout was computed"; - EXPECT_EQ(ALOOPER_POLL_WAKE, result) - << "pollOnce result should be ALOOPER_POLL_WAKE due to wakeup"; + EXPECT_EQ(Looper::POLL_WAKE, result) + << "pollOnce result should be Looper::POLL_WAKE due to wakeup"; EXPECT_EQ(size_t(0), handler->messages.size()) << "no message handled yet"; @@ -582,16 +582,16 @@ TEST_F(LooperTest, SendMessageAtTime_WhenSentToTheFuture_ShouldInvokeHandlerAfte << "handled message"; EXPECT_NEAR(100, elapsedMillis, TIMING_TOLERANCE_MS) << "second poll should end around the time of the delayed message dispatch"; - EXPECT_EQ(ALOOPER_POLL_CALLBACK, result) - << "pollOnce result should be ALOOPER_POLL_CALLBACK because message was sent"; + EXPECT_EQ(Looper::POLL_CALLBACK, result) + << "pollOnce result should be Looper::POLL_CALLBACK because message was sent"; result = mLooper->pollOnce(100); elapsedMillis = ns2ms(stopWatch.elapsedTime()); EXPECT_NEAR(100 + 100, elapsedMillis, TIMING_TOLERANCE_MS) << "third poll should timeout"; - EXPECT_EQ(ALOOPER_POLL_TIMEOUT, result) - << "pollOnce result should be ALOOPER_POLL_TIMEOUT because there were no messages left"; + EXPECT_EQ(Looper::POLL_TIMEOUT, result) + << "pollOnce result should be Looper::POLL_TIMEOUT because there were no messages left"; } TEST_F(LooperTest, SendMessageAtTime_WhenSentToThePast_ShouldInvokeHandlerDuringNextPoll) { @@ -605,8 +605,8 @@ TEST_F(LooperTest, SendMessageAtTime_WhenSentToThePast_ShouldInvokeHandlerDuring EXPECT_NEAR(0, elapsedMillis, TIMING_TOLERANCE_MS) << "elapsed time should approx. zero because message was already sent"; - EXPECT_EQ(ALOOPER_POLL_CALLBACK, result) - << "pollOnce result should be ALOOPER_POLL_CALLBACK because message was sent"; + EXPECT_EQ(Looper::POLL_CALLBACK, result) + << "pollOnce result should be Looper::POLL_CALLBACK because message was sent"; EXPECT_EQ(size_t(1), handler->messages.size()) << "handled message"; EXPECT_EQ(MSG_TEST1, handler->messages[0].what) @@ -624,8 +624,8 @@ TEST_F(LooperTest, SendMessageAtTime_WhenSentToThePresent_ShouldInvokeHandlerDur EXPECT_NEAR(0, elapsedMillis, TIMING_TOLERANCE_MS) << "elapsed time should approx. zero because message was already sent"; - EXPECT_EQ(ALOOPER_POLL_CALLBACK, result) - << "pollOnce result should be ALOOPER_POLL_CALLBACK because message was sent"; + EXPECT_EQ(Looper::POLL_CALLBACK, result) + << "pollOnce result should be Looper::POLL_CALLBACK because message was sent"; EXPECT_EQ(size_t(1), handler->messages.size()) << "handled message"; EXPECT_EQ(MSG_TEST1, handler->messages[0].what) @@ -645,15 +645,15 @@ TEST_F(LooperTest, RemoveMessage_WhenRemovingAllMessagesForHandler_ShouldRemoveT EXPECT_NEAR(0, elapsedMillis, TIMING_TOLERANCE_MS) << "elapsed time should approx. zero because message was sent so looper was awoken"; - EXPECT_EQ(ALOOPER_POLL_WAKE, result) - << "pollOnce result should be ALOOPER_POLL_WAKE because looper was awoken"; + EXPECT_EQ(Looper::POLL_WAKE, result) + << "pollOnce result should be Looper::POLL_WAKE because looper was awoken"; EXPECT_EQ(size_t(0), handler->messages.size()) << "no messages to handle"; result = mLooper->pollOnce(0); - EXPECT_EQ(ALOOPER_POLL_TIMEOUT, result) - << "pollOnce result should be ALOOPER_POLL_TIMEOUT because there was nothing to do"; + EXPECT_EQ(Looper::POLL_TIMEOUT, result) + << "pollOnce result should be Looper::POLL_TIMEOUT because there was nothing to do"; EXPECT_EQ(size_t(0), handler->messages.size()) << "no messages to handle"; } @@ -673,8 +673,8 @@ TEST_F(LooperTest, RemoveMessage_WhenRemovingSomeMessagesForHandler_ShouldRemove EXPECT_NEAR(0, elapsedMillis, TIMING_TOLERANCE_MS) << "elapsed time should approx. zero because message was sent so looper was awoken"; - EXPECT_EQ(ALOOPER_POLL_CALLBACK, result) - << "pollOnce result should be ALOOPER_POLL_CALLBACK because two messages were sent"; + EXPECT_EQ(Looper::POLL_CALLBACK, result) + << "pollOnce result should be Looper::POLL_CALLBACK because two messages were sent"; EXPECT_EQ(size_t(2), handler->messages.size()) << "no messages to handle"; EXPECT_EQ(MSG_TEST2, handler->messages[0].what) @@ -684,8 +684,8 @@ TEST_F(LooperTest, RemoveMessage_WhenRemovingSomeMessagesForHandler_ShouldRemove result = mLooper->pollOnce(0); - EXPECT_EQ(ALOOPER_POLL_TIMEOUT, result) - << "pollOnce result should be ALOOPER_POLL_TIMEOUT because there was nothing to do"; + EXPECT_EQ(Looper::POLL_TIMEOUT, result) + << "pollOnce result should be Looper::POLL_TIMEOUT because there was nothing to do"; EXPECT_EQ(size_t(2), handler->messages.size()) << "no more messages to handle"; } |